Použitá literatura
AQUACEL, KRYCÍ MATERIÁL HYDROFIBER (str. 3)
1. Armstrong SH, Ruckley CV. Use of fibrous dresing in exuding leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 1997; 6 (7): 322–324. 2. Robinson BJ. The use of a hydrofibre dressing in wound management. J Wound Care. 2000; 9 (1): 32–34. 3. Waring et al. A new wound care treatment for the 90.s.
The Hydrofibre CovaTec, Data on file. 4. Moore PJ, Foster L. Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds, B. J. N. 2000; 9 (17): 1128–1132.
AQUACEL AG
1. Data on File: MA068, ConvaTec. 2. Harding KG, Price P, Robinson B, Thomas S, Hofman D. Cost and dressing evaluation of hydrofiber and alginate dressings in the management of community-based patients withchronic leg ulceration. 3. Robinson BJ. The use of a hydrofibre dressing in wound management. J Wound Care. 2000; 9: 32–34. Wounds. 2001;13: 229–236. 4. Armstrong SH, Ruckley CV. Use of a fibrous dressing in exuding legulcers. J Wound Care. 1997; 6: 322–324.
AQUACEL SURGICAL, AQUACEL AG SURGICAL
1. Jones SA, Bowler PG, Walker M, Parsons D. Controlling wound bioburden with a novel silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing. Wound Repair Regen. 2004; 12 (3): 288–294. 2. Bowler PG, Jones SA, Walker M, Parsons D. Microbicidal properties of a silvercontaining hydrofiber dressing against a variety of burn wound pathogens. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004; 25 (2):192–196. 3. Data on File: MA068, ConvaTec.
AQUACEL FOAM
1. Okan D, Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald RG. The role of moisture balance in wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007; 20: 39–53; quiz 54–55. 2. Walker M, Lam S, Pritchard D, Cochrane CA. Care. 2003; 12 (4): 125–128. 4. Jones SA, Bowler PG, Walker M. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings is influencedby dressing conformability with a wound surface. Wounds. 2005; 17 (9): periwound skin. World Wide Wounds. http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2009/October/Lawton-Langoen/vulnerable-skin-2.html. Accessed November 4, 2011. 7. AQUACEL® foam dressing – waterproofness, in a carboxymethylcellulose (Aquacel) and alginate dressing. Biomaterials. 2003; 24 (5): 883–890. 9. Waring MJ, Parsons D. Physico-chemical characterisation of carboxymethylated spun cellulose fibres.
AQUACEL AG BURN
1. Caruso DM, Foster KN, Hermans MHE, Rick C. AQUACEL®Ag in the management of partial thickness burns: Results of a clinical trial. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2004 Jan/Feb; 25 (1): 89–97. 2. Hoekstra MJ, Hermans MHE, Richters CD, Dutrieux RP. A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a Hydrofiber or tulle gauze dressing. J Wound Care. 2002; 11(2):113–119. 3. Clinical Study Report CW-0508-06-A083: A Phase II, Non-Comparative Evaluation of Carboxymethylcellulose Silver Reinforced with Nylon in the Care of Partial Thickness Burns, July 2008. 4. Caruso DM, Foster KN, Blome-Eberwein SA, et al. Randomized clinical study of Hydrofiber dressing with silver or silver sulfadiazine in the management of partial-thickness burns. J Burn Care Res. 2006; 27 (3): 298–309. 5. Armstrong SH, Brown DA, Hill E, Ruckley CV. A randomized trial of a new Hydrofiber dressing, AQUACEL®, and an alginate in the treatment of exuding leg ulcers. Presented at 5th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; Harrogate, UK: November 1995. 6. Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, et al. Clinical comparative study of AQUACEL® and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 53 (2): 132–136. 7. Kogan L, Moldavsky M, Szvalb S, Govrin-Yehudain J. Comparative study of AQUACEL® and Silverol treatment in burns. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2004; 17 (4): 201–207. 8. Walker M, Hobot JA, Newman GR, Bowler PG. Scanning electron microscopic examination of bacterial immobilization in a carboxymethyl cellulose (AQUACEL®) and alginate dressing. Biomaterials. 2003; 24 (5): 883–890. 9. Bowler PG, Jones SA, Davies BJ, Coyle E. Infection control properties of some wound dressings. J Wound Care. 1999; 8 (10): 499–502. 10. Jones SA, Bowler PG, Walker M, Parsons D. Controlling wound bioburden with a novel silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing. Wound Repair Regen. 2004; 12 (3): 288–294. 11. Newman GR, Walker M, Hobot J, Bowler P. Visualisation of bacterial sequestration and bactericidal activity within hydrating Hydrofiber® wound dressings. Biomaterials. 2006; 27 (7): 1129–1139. 12. Jones S, Bowler PG, Walker M. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings is influenced by dressing conformability with a wound surface. WOUNDS. 2005; 17 (9): 263–270. 13. Coutts P, Sibbald RG. The effect of a silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing on superficial wound bed and bacterial balance of chronic wounds. Int Wound J. 2005;2(4):348-356. 14. Robinson BJ. The use of a Hydrofiber dressing in wound management. J Wound Care. 2009; 9 (1): 32–34.
